PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCIIX vs. GSSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCIIX achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GCIIX has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.


GCIIX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
12.60%
6M
15.21%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.97%

GSSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
12.60%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.83%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GCIIX and GSSRX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.16

Over the past year, GCIIX and GSSRX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCIIX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCIIXGSSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.53

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.96

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

13.08

-4.01

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCIIX and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCIIXGSSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.16

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.85

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

1.01

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.98

-0.66

Drawdowns

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and GSSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCIIXGSSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.08%

-9.03%

-52.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-1.62%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-1.62%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.58%

-8.88%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

-9.03%

-30.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-1.26%

-13.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

0.36%

+2.93%

Volatility

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 0.71%. This indicates that GCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCIIXGSSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

0.71%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

1.77%

+10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

2.22%

+13.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

2.43%

+13.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

2.41%

+14.38%

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCIIX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than GSSRX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.91%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCIIX and GSSRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCIIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCIIX dropped -61.08% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.

GSSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCIIX and GSSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer