GCIIX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCIIX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GCIIX returned 12.23%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for GSIMX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCIIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCIIX achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 6.45% return.

GCIIX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 6.07%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 30.53%
• 3Y*: 24.19%
• 5Y*: 12.23%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 12.69%
• 3Y*: 17.16%
• 5Y*: 9.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund	12.60%	40.72%	9.65%	20.80%	-14.91%	11.71%	7.83%	18.52%	-15.82%	28.57%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	6.45%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GCIIX and GSIMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between GCIIX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GCIIX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCIIX

GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 19
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCIIX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.27	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	1.78	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.23	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.56	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	5.22	+3.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCIIX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCIIX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	1.27	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.63	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.82	-0.50

Drawdowns

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCIIX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.08%	-28.84%	-32.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-7.81%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	-10.32%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.58%	-25.37%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.70%	+3.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.04%	-4.82%	-10.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	2.33%	+0.96%

Volatility

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.77%. This indicates that GCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCIIX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	2.77%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	7.89%	+4.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	9.66%	+5.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	14.36%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.79%	15.69%	+1.10%

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCIIX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund	6.91%	7.78%	9.24%	2.81%	3.94%	6.33%	1.86%	2.46%	1.94%	1.62%	2.51%	1.45%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.81%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCIIX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

GCIIX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCIIX or GSIMX?

GCIIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GSIMX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCIIX dropped -61.08% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.