GCIIX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GCIIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 15, 1997. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | -0.88% | 40.72% | 9.65% | 20.80% | -14.91% | 11.71% | 7.83% | 18.52% | -15.82% | 29.65% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 22.89% | 27.68% | -14.85% | 25.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCIIX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, GCIIX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.
GCIIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCIIX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GCIIX
GSIFX
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCIIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 0.60 | +1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 0.91 | +1.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.12 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.81 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 3.23 | +4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCIIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 0.60 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.32 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.48 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.30 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCIIX and GSIFX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | 7.85% | 7.78% | 9.24% | 2.81% | 3.94% | 6.33% | 1.86% | 2.46% | 1.94% | 1.62% | 2.51% | 1.45% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCIIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -59.25% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -12.15% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.58% | -31.94% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.85% | -35.00% | -4.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.85% | -11.48% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.11% | -15.30% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.06% | +0.08% |
Volatility
GCIIX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) at 6.71%. This indicates that GCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCIIX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 6.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 11.13% | -0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 16.87% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 16.71% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 17.32% | -0.65% |