GCIIX vs. GCSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX).
GCIIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 15, 1997. GCSIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Aug 15, 1997.
Performance
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | -0.88% | 40.72% | 9.65% | 20.80% | -14.91% | 11.71% | 7.83% | 18.52% | -15.82% | 29.65% |
GCSIX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund | -0.86% | 15.66% | 33.50% | 19.76% | -19.98% | 23.56% | 6.95% | 25.43% | -8.82% | 11.82% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GCIIX having a -0.88% return and GCSIX slightly higher at -0.86%. Over the past 10 years, GCIIX has underperformed GCSIX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while GCSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.71% annualized return.
GCIIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 5.26%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
GCSIX
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 27.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GCSIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCIIX vs. GCSIX — Risk / Return Rank
GCIIX
GCSIX
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCIIX | GCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.13 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.69 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.57 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 6.31 | +1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCIIX | GCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.13 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.42 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.33 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCIIX and GCSIX is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Dividend Comparison
GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, less than GCSIX's 10.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | 7.85% | 7.78% | 9.24% | 2.81% | 3.94% | 6.33% | 1.86% | 2.46% | 1.94% | 1.62% | 2.51% | 1.45% |
GCSIX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund | 10.63% | 10.54% | 25.02% | 0.75% | 0.87% | 30.90% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 6.50% | 0.27% | 0.60% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GCSIX drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and GCSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCIIX | GCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -63.23% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -13.74% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.58% | -30.97% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.85% | -45.08% | +5.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.85% | -10.06% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.11% | -11.47% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.65% | -0.51% |
Volatility
GCIIX vs. GCSIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity Insights Fund (GCSIX) at 6.60%. This indicates that GCIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCIIX | GCSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.14% | 6.60% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.99% | 14.41% | -3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 23.64% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 23.04% | -7.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 23.71% | -7.04% |