PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF (GCEX.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GCEX.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCEX.L achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than IGDA.L's 11.80% return.


GCEX.L

1D
-0.75%
1M
-9.70%
6M
7.04%
YTD
15.08%
1Y
40.93%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-6.57%
10Y*

IGDA.L

1D
-1.26%
1M
-2.65%
6M
10.16%
YTD
11.80%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GCEX.L
Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF
15.08%32.21%-25.34%-15.45%-17.73%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.80%10.30%20.00%23.22%-11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GCEX.L and IGDA.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2022

0.60

The correlation between GCEX.L and IGDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCEX.L
GCEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GCEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GCEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IGDA.L
IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF (GCEX.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCEX.LIGDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.40

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.69

11.11

-3.42

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCEX.L and IGDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCEX.L drawdown since its inception was -78.22%, which is greater than IGDA.L's maximum drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCEX.L and IGDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCEX.LIGDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.22%

-22.43%

-55.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.30%

-7.19%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.81%

-22.43%

-30.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.32%

-3.99%

-53.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.38%

-4.18%

-53.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

2.21%

+3.10%

Volatility

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF (GCEX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) at 4.39%. This indicates that GCEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCEX.LIGDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

4.39%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.24%

11.43%

+5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.58%

14.50%

+8.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.72%

16.59%

+9.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

16.59%

+12.33%

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCEX.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCEX.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison

GCEX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while IGDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GCEX.L
Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF
1.40%2.07%1.38%0.69%0.09%0.19%
IGDA.L
Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCEX.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGDA.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGDA.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCEX.L.

GCEX.L tracks Invesco Markets II PLC - Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCEX.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCEX.L and IGDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer