GCED.L vs. SXLE.L
GCED.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) and SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - GCED.L tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index while SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCED.L returned -4.51%/yr vs 20.21%/yr for SXLE.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCED.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLE.L.
Performance
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCED.L achieves a 35.99% return, which is significantly higher than SXLE.L's 30.51% return.
GCED.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 35.99%
- 6M
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- 86.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 30.51%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 46.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 35.99% | 41.92% | -26.55% | -10.54% | -30.72% | -22.60% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.51% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 16.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCED.L and SXLE.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between GCED.L and SXLE.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCED.L
SXLE.L
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Utilities
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Energy
GCED.L
SXLE.L
Consumer Cyclical
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Technology
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Basic Materials
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Financial Services
GCED.L
SXLE.L
-
Communication Services
GCED.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Healthcare
GCED.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Real Estate
GCED.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
GCED.L
SXLE.L
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCED.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.35 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.61 | 3.17 | +4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.61 | 9.94 | +15.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCED.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.78 | 2.12 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.76 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.35 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCED.L drawdown since its inception was -72.10%, which is greater than SXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCED.L and SXLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCED.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.10% | -66.60% | -5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -14.55% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.20% | -20.90% | -32.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.88% | -27.87% | -42.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.99% | -7.44% | -24.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.83% | -13.96% | -30.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.65% | -1.27% |
Volatility
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) at 8.15%. This indicates that GCED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCED.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.12% | 8.15% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 18.52% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 21.87% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.32% | 26.65% | +1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.87% | 28.66% | +0.21% |
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCED.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCED.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
GCED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while SXLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.53% | 2.09% | 1.43% | 0.68% | 0.09% | 0.20% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCED.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCED.L.
GCED.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCED.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.
Find the right allocation for GCED.L and SXLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer