GCEBX vs. GSIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund Class A Shares (GCEBX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX).
GCEBX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jun 26, 2020. GSIFX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCEBX Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund Class A Shares | 12.06% | 39.79% | -14.20% | -14.97% | -11.37% | -2.89% | 46.85% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | -5.52% | 25.51% | 0.33% | 15.44% | -17.69% | 16.23% | 34.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCEBX achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's -5.52% return.
GCEBX
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 6M
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
GSIFX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCEBX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCEBX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank
GCEBX
GSIFX
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund Class A Shares (GCEBX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCEBX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.82 | 0.60 | +2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | 0.91 | +2.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.12 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.82 | 0.81 | +5.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.80 | 3.23 | +16.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCEBX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | 0.60 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.32 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.30 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCEBX and GSIFX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison
GCEBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than GSIFX's 2.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCEBX Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund Class A Shares | 1.26% | 1.41% | 2.61% | 2.98% | 0.56% | 6.08% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GSIFX Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A | 2.31% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 1.37% | 0.82% | 6.29% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 2.79% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCEBX drawdown since its inception was -45.74%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCEBX and GSIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCEBX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.74% | -59.25% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.75% | -12.15% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.51% | -31.94% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.13% | -11.48% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.29% | -15.30% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 3.06% | -0.49% |
Volatility
GCEBX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Fund Class A Shares (GCEBX) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) at 6.71%. This indicates that GCEBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCEBX | GSIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 6.71% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 11.13% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 16.87% | +0.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 16.71% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.23% | 17.32% | +1.91% |