PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCC vs. EMHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GCC vs. EMHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GCC vs. EMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GCC
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund
13.19%20.01%15.13%-3.72%7.74%12.41%
EMHC
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
-1.69%14.07%3.52%10.06%-17.75%1.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCC achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly higher than EMHC's -1.69% return.


GCC

1D
0.42%
1M
2.70%
YTD
13.19%
6M
19.55%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
7.15%

EMHC

1D
0.81%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
1.67%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCC vs. EMHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EMHC's 0.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GCC vs. EMHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCC
GCC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
GCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
GCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EMHC
EMHC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCC vs. EMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCCEMHCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.38

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.12

2.01

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.18

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.06

8.84

+1.22

GCC vs. EMHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the EMHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCC and EMHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCCEMHCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.38

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.15

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between GCC and EMHC is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GCC vs. EMHC - Dividend Comparison

GCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than EMHC's 6.33% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
GCC
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund
5.86%6.64%3.51%3.68%22.49%9.76%
EMHC
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
6.33%6.16%5.95%5.12%5.11%2.97%

Drawdowns

GCC vs. EMHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCC drawdown since its inception was -63.19%, which is greater than EMHC's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCC and EMHC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCEMHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-28.03%

-35.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-4.37%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-3.44%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.23%

-10.22%

-25.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.08%

+2.01%

Volatility

GCC vs. EMHC - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) at 2.75%. This indicates that GCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GCCEMHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

2.75%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.91%

3.85%

+11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

6.76%

+11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

9.05%

+7.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.76%

9.05%

+5.71%