GCAD vs. KDEF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GCAD (Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF) and KDEF (PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds. GCAD is actively managed, while KDEF is passively managed. Over the past year, GCAD returned 27.53% vs -1.81% for KDEF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCAD charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KDEF.

Performance

GCAD vs. KDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCAD achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than KDEF's -12.28% return.

GCAD

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: -4.29%
• 6M: 1.08%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 1Y: 27.53%
• 3Y*: 30.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KDEF

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -26.57%
• 6M: -32.11%
• YTD: -12.28%
• 1Y: -1.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCAD vs. KDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF	15.30%	31.75%
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	-12.28%	116.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GCAD and KDEF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.32

GCAD vs. KDEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GCAD	KDEF
Industrials	78.1%	87.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	6.6%
Communication Services	1.3%	-
Technology	1.0%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.8%	-
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GCAD vs. KDEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCAD

GCAD Risk / Return Rank: 47
GCAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
GCAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GCAD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GCAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GCAD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

KDEF

KDEF Risk / Return Rank: 10
KDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
KDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
KDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
KDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
KDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCAD vs. KDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) and PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCAD	KDEF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	-0.04	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	0.29	+1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.03	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	-0.04	+1.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.18	-0.12	+6.30

GCAD vs. KDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the KDEF Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCAD and KDEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCAD vs. KDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCAD drawdown since its inception was -16.14%, smaller than the maximum KDEF drawdown of -42.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCAD and KDEF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCAD	KDEF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.14%	-42.23%	+26.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.96%	-42.23%	+27.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.89%	-41.65%	+34.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.01%	-8.65%	+5.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	15.13%	-10.67%

Volatility

GCAD vs. KDEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) is 5.00%, while PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF (KDEF) has a volatility of 16.56%. This indicates that GCAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KDEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCAD	KDEF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	16.56%	-11.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.20%	39.99%	-22.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.67%	48.14%	-27.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	48.43%	-29.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	48.43%	-29.67%

GCAD vs. KDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCAD has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than KDEF's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCAD vs. KDEF - Dividend Comparison

GCAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than KDEF's 7.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GCAD Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF	1.79%	2.06%	4.94%	3.62%
KDEF PLUS Korea Defense Industry Index ETF	7.83%	5.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCAD and KDEF in my portfolio?

GCAD and KDEF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCAD or KDEF?

KDEF has higher volatility (16.56%) compared to GCAD (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCAD dropped -16.14% vs KDEF's -42.23%.

Which ETF is better, GCAD or KDEF?

On 1-year performance, GCAD leads with 27.53% vs -1.81% for KDEF. On fees, GCAD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, GCAD has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GCAD or KDEF?

Over the 1-year period, GCAD has performed better with a 27.53% return vs -1.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GCAD or KDEF?

GCAD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KDEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GCAD or KDEF?

KDEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.83%, compared with 1.79% for GCAD.

What is the main difference between GCAD and KDEF?

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and PLUS. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GCAD and 0.65% for KDEF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.