GBTC vs. CBOO
GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - GBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. GBTC is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBTC charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
GBTC vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -26.36% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.29% return.
GBTC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -34.03%
- YTD
- -26.36%
- 1Y
- -45.06%
- 3Y*
- 36.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- 45.83%
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GBTC vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -26.36% | -30.55% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.29% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBTC and CBOO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBTC vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
GBTC
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GBTC vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBTC | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBTC vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBTC | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -2.34% | -87.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.86% | -1.40% | -47.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.49% | -1.60% | -41.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.24% | — | — |
Volatility
GBTC vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBTC | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.36% | 2.00% | +42.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.84% | 2.00% | +59.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.44% | 2.00% | +79.44% |
GBTC vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBTC vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBTC and CBOO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.
GBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for GBTC and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer