PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSS.L achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than PHPP.L's 0.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GBSS.L having a 13.99% annualized return and PHPP.L not far behind at 13.52%.


GBSS.L

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
3.71%
6M
5.10%
1Y
33.15%
3Y*
27.74%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
13.99%

PHPP.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.92%
YTD
0.99%
6M
9.62%
1Y
51.59%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSS.L
Gold Bullion Securities
3.71%53.13%27.82%6.96%11.51%-3.12%19.73%14.42%4.17%1.53%
PHPP.L
WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals
0.99%72.45%17.27%-8.55%11.64%-10.26%22.29%22.41%5.44%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GBSS.L and PHPP.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2007

0.73

The correlation between GBSS.L and PHPP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSS.L
GBSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GBSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PHPP.L
PHPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PHPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PHPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) and WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSS.LPHPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.11

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

5.01

-0.08

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the PHPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSS.L and PHPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSS.LPHPP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.61

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.59

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.68

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.51

+0.15

Drawdowns

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSS.L drawdown since its inception was -42.08%, smaller than the maximum PHPP.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSS.L and PHPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSS.LPHPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.08%

-49.43%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.92%

-24.37%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.92%

-24.37%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

-26.89%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.41%

-26.89%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.16%

-22.56%

+6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.56%

-18.70%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

10.26%

-3.56%

Volatility

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) is 5.05%, while WisdomTree Physical Precious Metals (PHPP.L) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that GBSS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSS.LPHPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

7.69%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.82%

29.24%

-9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.96%

31.86%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

21.47%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

19.84%

-4.07%

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSS.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PHPP.L's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSS.L vs. PHPP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSS.L nor PHPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSS.L and PHPP.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBSS.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBSS.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for PHPP.L.

GBSS.L tracks Gold, while PHPP.L tracks Precious Metals Basket. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GBSS.L and 0.44% for PHPP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSS.L and PHPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer