PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBSP.L is traded in GBp, while QQQ3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSP.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ3.L's 56.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GBSP.L has underperformed QQQ3.L with an annualized return of 11.30%, while QQQ3.L has yielded a comparatively higher 45.00% annualized return.


GBSP.L

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
3.18%
6M
5.42%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.30%

QQQ3.L

1D
-2.48%
1M
21.42%
YTD
56.69%
6M
49.06%
1Y
122.20%
3Y*
59.98%
5Y*
28.18%
10Y*
45.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged
3.18%63.29%25.01%11.75%-1.73%-4.92%21.84%14.56%-4.55%8.43%
QQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
56.65%18.54%62.70%194.03%-77.15%89.15%103.95%120.21%-16.62%95.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GBSP.L and QQQ3.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

-0.02

The correlation between GBSP.L and QQQ3.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSP.L
GBSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ3.L
QQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSP.LQQQ3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.40

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

3.51

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

10.30

-5.79

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the QQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSP.L and QQQ3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSP.LQQQ3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.73

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.47

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.87

-0.49

Drawdowns

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, smaller than the maximum QQQ3.L drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSP.L and QQQ3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSP.LQQQ3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-79.21%

+41.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-35.87%

+18.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-58.56%

+41.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

-79.21%

+57.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

-79.21%

+56.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.96%

-2.48%

-13.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-18.79%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

12.24%

-5.36%

Volatility

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) is 6.25%, while WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (QQQ3.L) has a volatility of 14.53%. This indicates that GBSP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSP.LQQQ3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

14.53%

-8.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

33.84%

-12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.78%

46.05%

-21.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

60.35%

-43.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

58.56%

-43.00%

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ3.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSP.L vs. QQQ3.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSP.L nor QQQ3.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSP.L and QQQ3.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBSP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBSP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

GBSP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while QQQ3.L is Nasdaq-100. GBSP.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while QQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBSP.L and 0.75% for QQQ3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSP.L and QQQ3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer