PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSP.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than GGRP.L's 4.80% return.


GBSP.L

1D
0.76%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
3.18%
6M
5.42%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
30.23%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
11.30%

GGRP.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.00%
YTD
4.80%
6M
5.09%
1Y
16.45%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged
3.18%63.29%25.01%11.75%-1.73%-4.92%21.84%14.56%-4.55%1.82%
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD
4.80%7.06%9.85%11.62%-3.21%20.07%13.17%29.78%-5.75%13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between GBSP.L and GGRP.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2017

-0.01

The correlation between GBSP.L and GGRP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSP.L
GBSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

GGRP.L
GGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSP.LGGRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.89

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

7.20

-2.69

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSP.L and GGRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSP.LGGRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.60

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.72

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.90

-0.52

Drawdowns

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than GGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSP.L and GGRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSP.LGGRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-22.60%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-8.59%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-16.46%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

-16.46%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.96%

0.00%

-15.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.52%

-2.93%

-14.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

2.26%

+4.62%

Volatility

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.25% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that GBSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSP.LGGRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

3.00%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

8.07%

+13.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.78%

10.17%

+14.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

12.07%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

15.35%

+0.21%

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GGRP.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSP.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison

GBSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGRP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD
0.01%0.01%0.54%1.86%2.42%1.60%1.46%1.88%2.13%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSP.L and GGRP.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBSP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBSP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRP.L.

GBSP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while GGRP.L is Global Equities. GBSP.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while GGRP.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBSP.L and 0.38% for GGRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSP.L and GGRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer