PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBSP.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSP.L achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than DGRA.L's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GBSP.L has underperformed DGRA.L with an annualized return of 11.04%, while DGRA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.51% annualized return.


GBSP.L

1D
-2.79%
1M
-7.39%
YTD
0.31%
6M
2.48%
1Y
28.21%
3Y*
28.97%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
11.04%

DGRA.L

1D
0.07%
1M
3.69%
YTD
7.23%
6M
6.08%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
14.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged
0.31%63.29%25.01%11.75%-1.73%-4.92%21.84%14.56%-4.55%8.43%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
7.23%5.03%20.29%12.77%2.58%26.46%9.27%23.93%-1.03%15.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GBSP.L and DGRA.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016

-0.11

The correlation between GBSP.L and DGRA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (10 years) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSP.L
GBSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSP.LDGRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

3.67

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

11.79

-7.76

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSP.L and DGRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSP.LDGRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

1.81

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.92

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.93

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.93

-0.57

Drawdowns

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSP.L drawdown since its inception was -37.82%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSP.L and DGRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSP.LDGRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.82%

-23.29%

-14.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.30%

-5.57%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-18.01%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.05%

-18.01%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

-23.29%

+0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.30%

0.00%

-18.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.77%

-3.02%

-14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

1.74%

+5.23%

Volatility

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Gold - GBP Daily Hedged (GBSP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 3.13%. This indicates that GBSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSP.LDGRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

3.13%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

8.40%

+13.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.93%

11.31%

+13.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

14.01%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

15.66%

-0.07%

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSP.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBSP.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSP.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSP.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBSP.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBSP.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.

GBSP.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. GBSP.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged), while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GBSP.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSP.L and DGRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer