PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged (GBSE.DE) and WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBSE.DE achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than NTSG.DE's 8.92% return.


GBSE.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
0.31%
6M
4.58%
1Y
29.37%
3Y*
28.22%
5Y*
15.61%
10Y*
10.16%

NTSG.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
4.22%
YTD
8.92%
6M
7.22%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GBSE.DE and NTSG.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBSE.DE
GBSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GBSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSG.DE
NTSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged (GBSE.DE) and WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBSE.DENTSG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

3.29

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

11.64

-7.56

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBSE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the NTSG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBSE.DE and NTSG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBSE.DENTSG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.86

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.79

-0.48

Drawdowns

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than NTSG.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBSE.DE and NTSG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBSE.DENTSG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-19.64%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.55%

-6.26%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.18%

-0.09%

-16.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-3.69%

-15.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.02%

1.77%

+5.25%

Volatility

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Gold EUR Daily Hedged (GBSE.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) at 3.24%. This indicates that GBSE.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBSE.DENTSG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.93%

3.24%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.62%

8.09%

+13.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.64%

11.12%

+13.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

14.30%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

14.30%

+1.20%

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBSE.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSG.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBSE.DE vs. NTSG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither GBSE.DE nor NTSG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GBSE.DE and NTSG.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBSE.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NTSG.DE.

GBSE.DE is categorized as Gold, while NTSG.DE is Global Allocation. GBSE.DE tracks MS Long Gold Euro Hedged, while NTSG.DE tracks WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GBSE.DE and 0.25% for NTSG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBSE.DE and NTSG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer