PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GBRE.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and XMU.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBRE.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XMU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GBRE.L returned 3.81%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for XMU.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBRE.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for XMU.TO.

Performance

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBRE.L is traded in GBP, while XMU.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XMU.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBRE.L achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than XMU.TO's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, GBRE.L has underperformed XMU.TO with an annualized return of 3.81%, while XMU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.22% annualized return.

GBRE.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
6.19%
6M
5.11%
1Y
11.03%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
3.81%

XMU.TO

1D
0.08%
1M
3.10%
YTD
3.11%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
9.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBRE.L
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		6.19%1.33%0.96%5.25%-16.29%32.07%-13.82%16.79%-0.14%0.04%
XMU.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF		3.06%-3.49%14.32%3.57%0.60%18.97%1.96%21.99%6.56%8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GBRE.L and XMU.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2012

0.47

The correlation between GBRE.L and XMU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (5 years) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GBRE.L
XMU.TO

Real Estate

99.9%
2.2%

Industrials

0.0%
5.6%

Financial Services

0.0%
13.7%

Utilities

0.0%
7.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Communication Services

-

5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.9%

Energy

-

3.7%

Healthcare

-

12.6%

Technology

-

31.2%

Real Estate

GBRE.L
99.9%
XMU.TO
2.2%

Industrials

GBRE.L
0.0%
XMU.TO
5.6%

Financial Services

GBRE.L
0.0%
XMU.TO
13.7%

Utilities

GBRE.L
0.0%
XMU.TO
7.4%

Basic Materials

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
2.1%

Communication Services

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
9.9%

Energy

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
3.7%

Healthcare

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
12.6%

Technology

GBRE.L

-

XMU.TO
31.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF

Often compared with GBRE.L:
GBRE.L vs. BBOX.LGBRE.L vs. CMOP.LGBRE.L vs. IUSP.LGBRE.L vs. VTIGBRE.L vs. VGTGBRE.L vs. QQQGBRE.L vs. VOO
Often compared with XMU.TO:
XMU.TO vs. ZLU.TOXMU.TO vs. XMV.TOXMU.TO vs. XMS.TOXMU.TO vs. VFV.TOXMU.TO vs. XIT.TOXMU.TO vs. SMMVXMU.TO vs. XST.TO

Return for Risk

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GBRE.L
GBRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GBRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
XMU.TO
XMU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XMU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XMU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GBRE.LXMU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.98
0.20

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.43
0.34

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.04

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.26

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

0.57

+3.78

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBRE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the XMU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBRE.L and XMU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GBRE.LXMU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

0.20

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.51

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.58

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.77

-0.41

Drawdowns

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBRE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, which is greater than XMU.TO's maximum drawdown of -25.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBRE.L and XMU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GBRE.LXMU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.15%

-25.78%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-7.64%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.12%

-14.45%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.39%

-14.45%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.15%

-25.78%

-9.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.92%

-8.25%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.97%

-4.11%

-5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.53%

-0.97%

Volatility

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) at 2.56%. This indicates that GBRE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GBRE.LXMU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.56%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

7.22%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

9.85%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

12.42%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

15.92%

+0.06%

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBRE.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMU.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBRE.L vs. XMU.TO - Dividend Comparison

GBRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than XMU.TO's 1.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBRE.L
SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		0.75%1.45%2.73%2.66%2.84%1.79%2.76%3.25%4.30%3.99%2.40%2.09%
XMU.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF		1.12%1.10%1.14%1.33%1.10%1.00%1.59%1.36%1.39%1.51%1.73%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

GBRE.L and XMU.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMU.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMU.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBRE.L.

GBRE.L is categorized as REIT, while XMU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. GBRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while XMU.TO tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GBRE.L and 0.33% for XMU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBRE.L and XMU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer