GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L
GBRE.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and GLRA.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap) are both REIT funds from State Street tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBRE.L returned 2.07%/yr vs 2.44%/yr for GLRA.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GBRE.L is traded in GBP, while GLRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLRA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBRE.L achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than GLRA.L's 7.37% return.
GBRE.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.07%
- 10Y*
- 3.81%
GLRA.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 12.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- —
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBRE.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 6.19% | 1.33% | 0.96% | 5.25% | -16.29% | 32.07% | -13.82% | -3.55% |
GLRA.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap | 7.37% | 2.20% | 0.98% | 5.83% | -16.44% | 31.52% | -13.30% | -3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBRE.L and GLRA.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between GBRE.L and GLRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GBRE.L
GLRA.L
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
GBRE.L
GLRA.L
Industrials
GBRE.L
GLRA.L
Financial Services
GBRE.L
GLRA.L
Utilities
GBRE.L
GLRA.L
Basic Materials
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Communication Services
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Consumer Defensive
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Energy
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Healthcare
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Technology
GBRE.L
-
GLRA.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBRE.L
GLRA.L
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) and SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBRE.L | GLRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 1.67 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 5.54 | -1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBRE.L | GLRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.15 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.06 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBRE.L drawdown since its inception was -35.15%, roughly equal to the maximum GLRA.L drawdown of -34.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBRE.L and GLRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBRE.L | GLRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.15% | -34.16% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -7.90% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.12% | -17.29% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.39% | -28.01% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.92% | -4.41% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.97% | -13.04% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.39% | +0.17% |
Volatility
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GBRE.L) is 3.39%, while SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that GBRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBRE.L | GLRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 3.94% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.79% | 10.45% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 13.25% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 15.82% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 20.68% | -4.70% |
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GBRE.L and GLRA.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
GBRE.L vs. GLRA.L - Dividend Comparison
GBRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while GLRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBRE.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 0.75% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 2.84% | 1.79% | 2.76% | 3.25% | 4.30% | 3.99% | 2.40% | 2.09% |
GLRA.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBRE.L and GLRA.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBRE.L and GLRA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD.
Find the right allocation for GBRE.L and GLRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer