PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPG.L vs. XBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBPG.L is traded in GBP, while XBI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XBI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPG.L achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly lower than XBI's 10.29% return.


GBPG.L

1D
0.28%
1M
1.08%
YTD
3.42%
6M
0.60%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
10Y*

XBI

1D
0.88%
1M
1.75%
YTD
10.29%
6M
8.75%
1Y
62.63%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
3.42%2.23%0.17%4.28%-9.15%-1.16%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
10.29%26.21%2.77%2.22%-17.05%-14.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPG.L and XBI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPG.L vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPG.L
GBPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBPG.LXBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

7.26

-6.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

19.76

-17.65

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the XBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPG.L and XBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.04%, smaller than the maximum XBI drawdown of -59.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPG.L and XBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPG.LXBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-59.49%

+44.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-8.55%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-32.52%

+29.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-20.73%

+19.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-18.45%

+12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

3.14%

-1.95%

Volatility

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) is 1.31%, while SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that GBPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPG.LXBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

10.04%

-8.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.34%

19.68%

-14.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.86%

24.95%

-19.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

30.89%

-25.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.40%

31.59%

-26.19%

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBPG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBPG.L vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison

GBPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than XBI's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
4.08%4.13%4.10%3.35%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.33%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPG.L and XBI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XBI.

GBPG.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while XBI is Health & Biotech Equities. GBPG.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GBPG.L and 0.35% for XBI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPG.L and XBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer