PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPG.L vs. CE31.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBPG.L is traded in GBP, while CE31.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CE31.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPG.L achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly higher than CE31.L's -0.96% return.


GBPG.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.56%
YTD
3.11%
6M
0.30%
1Y
3.02%
3Y*
3.71%
5Y*
10Y*

CE31.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
-0.96%
6M
-0.91%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
3.11%2.23%0.17%4.28%-9.15%-1.16%
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.96%7.55%-1.61%1.46%1.01%-2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPG.L and CE31.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2021

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPG.L
GBPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CE31.L
CE31.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
CE31.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CE31.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CE31.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CE31.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CE31.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) and iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBPG.LCE31.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

0.25

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

0.43

+2.14

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the CE31.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPG.L and CE31.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBPG.LCE31.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.17

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.01

-0.05

Drawdowns

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.04%, smaller than the maximum CE31.L drawdown of -98.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPG.L and CE31.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPG.LCE31.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-98.88%

+83.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-14.17%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-14.17%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-13.76%

+12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-8.09%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

8.16%

-6.99%

Volatility

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CE31.L) at 1.25%. This indicates that GBPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CE31.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPG.LCE31.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.25%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

20.12%

-14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.85%

20.41%

-14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.41%

10.40%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.41%

9.46%

-4.05%

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBPG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CE31.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBPG.L vs. CE31.L - Dividend Comparison

GBPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, while CE31.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CE31.L
iShares Euro Government Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
4.09%4.13%4.10%3.35%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPG.L and CE31.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CE31.L.

GBPG.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while CE31.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt 1-3 Yr TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GBPG.L and 0.15% for CE31.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPG.L and CE31.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer