PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPC.L vs. VECP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VECP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBPC.L is traded in GBp, while VECP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VECP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPC.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than VECP.L's -0.48% return.


GBPC.L

1D
0.26%
1M
2.00%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*

VECP.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.02%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
4.97%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.12%6.83%2.78%8.45%-17.18%-2.43%-0.23%
VECP.L
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
-0.48%8.47%0.17%6.15%-7.51%-7.24%-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPC.L and VECP.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.29

The correlation between GBPC.L and VECP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPC.L
GBPC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VECP.L
VECP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VECP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VECP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
VECP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VECP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VECP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VECP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBPC.LVECP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.21

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

3.08

+0.84

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the VECP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPC.L and VECP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBPC.LVECP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.97

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.12

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.33

-0.43

Drawdowns

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, which is greater than VECP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPC.L and VECP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPC.LVECP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-20.56%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.14%

-3.86%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-3.86%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.49%

-16.13%

-11.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

-3.44%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.46%

-7.60%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.52%

-0.27%

Volatility

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VECP.L) at 1.45%. This indicates that GBPC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VECP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPC.LVECP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

1.45%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

3.64%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

4.82%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

6.17%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

7.58%

+0.57%

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GBPC.L and VECP.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBPC.L vs. VECP.L - Dividend Comparison

GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than VECP.L's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
5.14%5.00%4.86%3.58%2.16%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VECP.L
Vanguard EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.42%3.37%4.05%3.45%2.12%0.94%0.99%0.93%1.10%1.23%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPC.L and VECP.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPC.L and VECP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while VECP.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPC.L and VECP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer