PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPC.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than LDUK.L's 3.01% return.


GBPC.L

1D
0.26%
1M
2.00%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*

LDUK.L

1D
0.72%
1M
2.00%
YTD
3.01%
6M
6.82%
1Y
12.69%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.12%6.83%2.78%8.45%-17.18%0.02%
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF
3.01%22.62%16.13%8.22%-3.33%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPC.L and LDUK.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.25

The correlation between GBPC.L and LDUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPC.L
GBPC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LDUK.L
LDUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBPC.LLDUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.11

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

4.06

-0.15

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the LDUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPC.L and LDUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBPC.LLDUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.87

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.69

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.76

-0.86

Drawdowns

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.18%, which is greater than LDUK.L's maximum drawdown of -17.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPC.L and LDUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPC.LLDUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.18%

-17.13%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.14%

-11.51%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-13.46%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.49%

-17.13%

-10.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.53%

-1.80%

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.46%

-3.66%

-7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

3.15%

-1.90%

Volatility

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) is 3.33%, while L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF (LDUK.L) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that GBPC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPC.LLDUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

4.63%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

12.32%

-7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

14.67%

-8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

15.61%

-7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

15.64%

-7.49%

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBPC.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LDUK.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBPC.L vs. LDUK.L - Dividend Comparison

GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than LDUK.L's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
5.14%5.00%4.86%3.58%2.16%0.87%
LDUK.L
L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions UK UCITS ETF
4.79%4.87%4.43%5.14%5.87%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPC.L and LDUK.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDUK.L.

GBPC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while LDUK.L is Europe Equities. GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while LDUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBPC.L and 0.25% for LDUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPC.L and LDUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer