PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBPC.L vs. IE15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IE15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBPC.L is traded in GBp, while IE15.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IE15.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBPC.L achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly higher than IE15.L's -3.61% return.


GBPC.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-1.06%
YTD
-2.60%
1Y
1.20%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*

IE15.L

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.95%
6M
-1.79%
YTD
-3.61%
1Y
-1.93%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
0.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-2.60%6.83%2.78%8.35%-17.11%-3.03%1.71%
IE15.L
iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-3.61%8.96%-0.40%3.66%-3.03%-6.25%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GBPC.L and IE15.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBPC.L
GBPC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IE15.L
IE15.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IE15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IE15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IE15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IE15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IE15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) and iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IE15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBPC.LIE15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.93

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

-0.39

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.48

-0.82

+1.29

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the IE15.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBPC.L and IE15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBPC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.45%, which is greater than IE15.L's maximum drawdown of -16.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBPC.L and IE15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBPC.LIE15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-16.54%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-4.93%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.01%

-4.93%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-9.97%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

-4.74%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-6.69%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.36%

+0.16%

Volatility

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IE15.L) at 1.19%. This indicates that GBPC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IE15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBPC.LIE15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.19%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

3.19%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.66%

4.47%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.92%

5.52%

+2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

6.85%

+0.78%

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBPC.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IE15.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GBPC.L vs. IE15.L - Dividend Comparison

GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than IE15.L's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.65%5.00%4.86%3.58%2.16%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IE15.L
iShares € Corp Bond 1-5yr UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
1.51%2.92%2.50%1.41%0.51%0.57%0.59%0.62%0.62%0.68%0.90%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBPC.L and IE15.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IE15.L.

GBPC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while IE15.L is Short-Term Bond. GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while IE15.L tracks BBG Euro Corp 1-5 Yrs (EUR). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for GBPC.L and 0.20% for IE15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBPC.L and IE15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer