GBOSX vs. BWG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GBOSX (JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund) and BWG (BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, GBOSX returned 4.04%/yr vs 4.92%/yr for BWG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBOSX charges 0.65%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for BWG.

Performance

GBOSX vs. BWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund (GBOSX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBOSX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than BWG's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GBOSX has underperformed BWG with an annualized return of 4.04%, while BWG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.92% annualized return.

GBOSX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 5.99%
• 3Y*: 5.90%
• 5Y*: 2.71%
• 10Y*: 4.04%

BWG

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 1.79%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 10.32%
• 3Y*: 12.02%
• 5Y*: 2.08%
• 10Y*: 4.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBOSX vs. BWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GBOSX JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund	1.35%	7.90%	3.53%	6.96%	-6.04%	1.37%	7.77%	10.57%	-1.89%	6.72%
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund	0.15%	17.38%	7.31%	15.94%	-21.53%	1.34%	6.30%	30.59%	-12.14%	17.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GBOSX and BWG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2013	0.44

The correlation between GBOSX and BWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GBOSX vs. BWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBOSX

GBOSX Risk / Return Rank: 32
GBOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GBOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GBOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GBOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GBOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BWG

BWG Risk / Return Rank: 12
BWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
BWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BWG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
BWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BWG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBOSX vs. BWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund (GBOSX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GBOSX	BWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	0.98	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	1.53	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.18	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	0.86	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	2.66	+2.67

GBOSX vs. BWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBOSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the BWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBOSX and BWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GBOSX vs. BWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBOSX drawdown since its inception was -11.48%, smaller than the maximum BWG drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBOSX and BWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBOSX	BWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.48%	-35.39%	+23.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.90%	-12.03%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.90%	-14.00%	+10.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.86%	-34.10%	+23.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.48%	-34.27%	+22.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-4.00%	+3.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-10.83%	+9.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.12%	3.88%	-2.76%

Volatility

GBOSX vs. BWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund (GBOSX) is 1.20%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that GBOSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBOSX	BWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	2.99%	-1.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.35%	8.58%	-5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	10.57%	-6.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.73%	14.07%	-10.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	15.01%	-11.53%

GBOSX vs. BWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBOSX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BWG's 2.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBOSX vs. BWG - Dividend Comparison

GBOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than BWG's 12.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BWG BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund	12.03%	11.47%	12.00%	11.73%	13.25%	8.20%	6.81%	6.55%	8.70%	8.35%	10.31%	16.41%
GBOSX JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities Fund	4.71%	4.79%	4.41%	3.92%	3.68%	2.61%	3.29%	4.06%	5.74%	3.32%	4.80%	5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBOSX and BWG in my portfolio?

GBOSX and BWG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBOSX or BWG?

BWG has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to GBOSX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBOSX dropped -11.48% vs BWG's -35.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.