GBMFX vs. HRLYX
GBMFX (GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund) and HRLYX (Hartford Real Asset Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, GBMFX returned 6.82%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for HRLYX. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GBMFX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for HRLYX.
Performance
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBMFX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly lower than HRLYX's 14.42% return. Over the past 10 years, GBMFX has underperformed HRLYX with an annualized return of 6.82%, while HRLYX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.29% annualized return.
GBMFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.69%
HRLYX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund | 12.95% | 22.89% | 4.33% | 13.46% | -2.24% | 2.97% | -2.50% | 11.62% | -5.36% | 13.05% |
HRLYX Hartford Real Asset Fund | 14.42% | 21.89% | -5.41% | 7.44% | 0.72% | 21.58% | -1.13% | 12.34% | -10.11% | 9.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBMFX and HRLYX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GBMFX and HRLYX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBMFX vs. HRLYX — Risk / Return Rank
GBMFX
HRLYX
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) and Hartford Real Asset Fund (HRLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GBMFX | HRLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.65 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.59 | 4.43 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 17.16 | -0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBMFX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum HRLYX drawdown of -45.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBMFX and HRLYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBMFX | HRLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -45.58% | +22.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -5.42% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.16% | -11.17% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.20% | -16.86% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.40% | -36.82% | +13.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.36% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -14.26% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.40% | +0.20% |
Volatility
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund (GBMFX) is 1.67%, while Hartford Real Asset Fund (HRLYX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that GBMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBMFX | HRLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 2.33% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 5.75% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.21% | 7.14% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.34% | 10.77% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.97% | 12.60% | -4.63% |
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBMFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than HRLYX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBMFX vs. HRLYX - Dividend Comparison
GBMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than HRLYX's 3.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBMFX GMO Benchmark-Free Allocation Fund | 3.75% | 4.16% | 5.14% | 5.64% | 3.20% | 2.46% | 3.73% | 3.35% | 3.67% | 2.39% | 1.60% | 2.10% |
HRLYX Hartford Real Asset Fund | 3.45% | 3.95% | 0.00% | 4.36% | 4.79% | 19.52% | 3.10% | 3.11% | 2.49% | 3.62% | 0.76% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBMFX and HRLYX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRLYX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to GBMFX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBMFX dropped -23.40% vs HRLYX's -45.58%.
GBMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 3.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBMFX and HRLYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer