PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBLAX vs. GIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBLAX achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than GIMFX's 14.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GBLAX having a 7.02% annualized return and GIMFX not far ahead at 7.25%.


GBLAX

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.01%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.73%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
7.02%

GIMFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
3.19%
YTD
14.03%
6M
16.16%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
7.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBLAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A
6.41%17.12%6.56%13.68%-14.25%9.18%10.47%17.26%-6.13%13.99%
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
14.03%25.37%2.67%14.75%-1.24%4.05%-7.25%13.24%-5.58%14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GBLAX and GIMFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.77

The correlation between GBLAX and GIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBLAX vs. GIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBLAX
GBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GIMFX
GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBLAXGIMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.83

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

5.01

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

19.44

-8.26

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the GIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBLAX and GIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBLAXGIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

4.13

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

1.11

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.81

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.70

-0.05

Drawdowns

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum GIMFX drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBLAX and GIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBLAXGIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

-25.87%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-6.53%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

-8.02%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-14.02%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.36%

-25.87%

+2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.11%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-4.29%

+0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.68%

-0.15%

Volatility

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) have volatilities of 2.77% and 2.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBLAXGIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

2.78%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

6.21%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

7.92%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

8.58%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

8.98%

+1.47%

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBLAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMFX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBLAX vs. GIMFX - Dividend Comparison

GBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than GIMFX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBLAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A
5.99%6.34%5.53%1.61%1.52%6.02%1.24%1.87%2.30%3.15%2.00%3.28%
GIMFX
GMO Implementation Fund
3.75%4.28%3.39%5.93%3.59%3.28%2.25%3.99%4.59%2.95%1.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBLAX and GIMFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIMFX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to GBLAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBLAX dropped -23.36% vs GIMFX's -25.87%.

GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBLAX and GIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer