PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBLAX vs. GGSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBLAX achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than GGSIX's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GBLAX has underperformed GGSIX with an annualized return of 7.02%, while GGSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.29% annualized return.


GBLAX

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.01%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.73%
1Y
16.71%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
7.02%

GGSIX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.35%
YTD
9.79%
6M
10.57%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBLAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A
6.41%17.12%6.56%13.68%-14.25%9.18%10.47%17.26%-6.13%13.99%
GGSIX
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio
9.79%19.29%19.26%17.83%-16.86%17.04%14.34%24.92%-10.65%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GBLAX and GGSIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2011

0.92

The correlation between GBLAX and GGSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBLAX vs. GGSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBLAX
GBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GGSIX
GGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBLAXGGSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

2.91

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

12.94

-1.76

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the GGSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBLAX and GGSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBLAXGGSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.32

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.75

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.79

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.47

+0.19

Drawdowns

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum GGSIX drawdown of -52.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBLAX and GGSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBLAXGGSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

-52.85%

+29.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-8.71%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

-14.78%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-26.74%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.36%

-30.36%

+7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.63%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-9.20%

+5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

1.95%

-0.42%

Volatility

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) is 2.77%, while Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio (GGSIX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that GBLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBLAXGGSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.26%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

8.70%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

10.94%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

13.43%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

14.33%

-3.88%

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBLAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GGSIX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBLAX vs. GGSIX - Dividend Comparison

GBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than GGSIX's 10.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBLAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A
5.99%6.34%5.53%1.61%1.52%6.02%1.24%1.87%2.30%3.15%2.00%3.28%
GGSIX
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio
10.81%11.87%12.21%1.73%5.76%6.57%3.47%5.77%3.02%2.77%1.35%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GBLAX and GGSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GGSIX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to GBLAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBLAX dropped -23.36% vs GGSIX's -52.85%.

GGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBLAX and GGSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer