PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBLAX vs. ANWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBLAX achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly lower than ANWPX's 7.10% return. Over the past 10 years, GBLAX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 6.99%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.39% annualized return.


GBLAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
6.41%
6M
6.91%
1Y
16.80%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
6.99%

ANWPX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.97%
YTD
7.10%
6M
7.84%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBLAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A
6.41%17.12%6.56%13.68%-14.25%9.18%10.47%17.26%-6.13%13.99%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
7.10%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GBLAX and ANWPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2011

0.92

The correlation between GBLAX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBLAX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBLAX
GBLAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GBLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GBLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBLAXANWPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.71

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

7.22

+3.72

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBLAX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBLAXANWPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.47

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.51

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.75

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.67

-0.01

Drawdowns

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBLAX and ANWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBLAXANWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

-52.34%

+28.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.74%

-11.48%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

-17.93%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-34.45%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.36%

-34.45%

+11.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.26%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-8.10%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.72%

-1.19%

Volatility

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A (GBLAX) is 2.77%, while American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that GBLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBLAXANWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.97%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.79%

10.77%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

13.39%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

17.20%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

17.82%

-7.37%

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBLAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBLAX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

GBLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, less than ANWPX's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.14%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
GBLAX
American Funds Global Balanced Fund Class A
5.99%6.34%5.53%1.61%1.52%6.02%1.24%1.87%2.30%3.15%2.00%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GBLAX and ANWPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANWPX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to GBLAX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBLAX dropped -23.36% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

GBLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBLAX and ANWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer