GBIAX vs. PCIFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GBIAX (Nationwide Bond Index Fund) and PCIFX (PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, GBIAX returned 0.79%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for PCIFX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GBIAX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for PCIFX.

Performance

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) and PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments (PCIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBIAX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than PCIFX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GBIAX has underperformed PCIFX with an annualized return of 0.79%, while PCIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.02% annualized return.

GBIAX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 3.53%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: -0.73%
• 10Y*: 0.79%

PCIFX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 4.56%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: 0.91%
• 10Y*: 2.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund	-0.18%	6.54%	0.44%	5.03%	-14.06%	-2.38%	6.60%	8.08%	-0.74%	2.89%
PCIFX PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments	0.65%	7.03%	3.84%	7.82%	-13.38%	-1.83%	8.04%	8.66%	-0.86%	3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between GBIAX and PCIFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1999	0.88

The correlation between GBIAX and PCIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GBIAX vs. PCIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBIAX

GBIAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
GBIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GBIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GBIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GBIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
GBIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

PCIFX

PCIFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
PCIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PCIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PCIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PCIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PCIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) and PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments (PCIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GBIAX	PCIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.39	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	2.14	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.26	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.28	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.46	6.78	-3.32

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the PCIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBIAX and PCIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBIAX drawdown since its inception was -20.26%, which is greater than PCIFX's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBIAX and PCIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBIAX	PCIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.26%	-18.54%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	-2.30%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.30%	-5.34%	-0.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.07%	-18.16%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.26%	-18.54%	-1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.57%	-0.85%	-5.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-1.90%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	0.75%	+0.34%

Volatility

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments (PCIFX) at 1.00%. This indicates that GBIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBIAX	PCIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	1.00%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	2.65%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	3.79%	+0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.01%	5.80%	+0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.96%	4.71%	+0.25%

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBIAX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PCIFX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

GBIAX vs. PCIFX - Dividend Comparison

GBIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PCIFX's 5.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GBIAX Nationwide Bond Index Fund	3.30%	3.18%	3.07%	2.57%	1.59%	3.02%	1.79%	2.27%	2.29%	1.93%	2.15%	2.43%
PCIFX PACE Intermediate Fixed Income Investments	5.48%	5.04%	6.03%	5.50%	2.79%	2.93%	4.46%	2.61%	2.70%	1.99%	1.86%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GBIAX and PCIFX in my portfolio?

GBIAX and PCIFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GBIAX or PCIFX?

GBIAX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to PCIFX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBIAX dropped -20.26% vs PCIFX's -18.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.