GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L).

GBHY.L and XUHY.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GBHY.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI Global High Yield Liquid Corporate Climate Transition ESG Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023. XUHY.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. Both GBHY.L and XUHY.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GBHY.L Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist	-0.72%	10.42%	5.93%	7.76%
XUHY.L Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D	0.05%	9.20%	7.08%	8.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBHY.L achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than XUHY.L's 0.05% return.

GBHY.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -0.72%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 7.31%
• 3Y*: 7.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XUHY.L

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 6M: 1.65%
• 1Y: 7.64%
• 3Y*: 8.24%
• 5Y*: 3.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBHY.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XUHY.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GBHY.L

Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist

XUHY.L

Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBHY.L

GBHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
GBHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GBHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GBHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
GBHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

XUHY.L

XUHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XUHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
XUHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
XUHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
XUHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
XUHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GBHY.L	XUHY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.28	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	1.85	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	3.56	-1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	15.88	-5.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the XUHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBHY.L and XUHY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GBHY.L	XUHY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.28	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	0.61	+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between GBHY.L and XUHY.L is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Dividend Comparison

GBHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than XUHY.L's 6.54% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GBHY.L Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist	6.65%	6.49%	6.89%	5.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUHY.L Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D	6.54%	6.29%	7.64%	5.89%	6.12%	9.57%	5.49%	4.83%

Drawdowns

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBHY.L drawdown since its inception was -5.09%, smaller than the maximum XUHY.L drawdown of -22.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBHY.L and XUHY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GBHY.L	XUHY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.09%	-22.78%	+17.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-2.83%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-0.95%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-3.36%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.58%	+0.20%

Volatility

GBHY.L vs. XUHY.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1D (XUHY.L) have volatilities of 2.13% and 2.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GBHY.L	XUHY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.13%	2.10%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.12%	3.31%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.05%	5.95%	-0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.63%	7.54%	-1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.63%	9.69%	-4.06%