PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GBDV.L is traded in GBP, while SPXS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GBDV.L having a 10.40% return and SPXS.L slightly lower at 9.88%. Over the past 10 years, GBDV.L has outperformed SPXS.L with an annualized return of 6.34%, while SPXS.L has yielded a comparatively lower -27.53% annualized return.


GBDV.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.54%
6M
7.72%
YTD
10.40%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
6.34%

SPXS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.81%
6M
9.42%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
-98.79%
3Y*
-74.39%
5Y*
-54.77%
10Y*
-27.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
10.40%9.25%8.98%1.23%4.57%16.69%-12.13%15.83%-3.84%8.16%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.88%-98.91%27.76%20.65%-8.84%30.87%14.43%25.88%0.43%11.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GBDV.L and SPXS.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between GBDV.L and SPXS.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS.L
SPXS.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GBDV.LSPXS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.52

+0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

-1.00

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

-1.23

+9.60

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the SPXS.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBDV.L and SPXS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, smaller than the maximum SPXS.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and SPXS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBDV.LSPXS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-99.07%

+58.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-99.07%

+93.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.57%

-99.07%

+85.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.18%

-99.07%

+82.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.77%

-99.07%

+64.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-98.92%

+98.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.55%

-7.34%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

80.59%

-78.63%

Volatility

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) is 2.36%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXS.L) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that GBDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBDV.LSPXS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.88%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.60%

9.25%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

99.46%

-90.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

46.95%

-35.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.05%

35.32%

-21.27%

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS.L's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBDV.L vs. SPXS.L - Dividend Comparison

GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, while SPXS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
3.78%4.21%3.80%4.25%4.26%3.68%3.91%3.60%3.87%3.28%3.49%3.73%
SPXS.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBDV.L and SPXS.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXS.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXS.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index, while SPXS.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GBDV.L and 0.05% for SPXS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBDV.L and SPXS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer