GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L
GBDV.L (SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS) and SBUY.L (Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GBDV.L tracks the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index while SBUY.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GBDV.L returned 7.98%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for SBUY.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GBDV.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SBUY.L.
Performance
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GBDV.L is traded in GBP, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBDV.L achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GBDV.L has underperformed SBUY.L with an annualized return of 7.98%, while SBUY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.06% annualized return.
GBDV.L
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 19.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
SBUY.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.06%
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 7.03% | 10.06% | 9.77% | 1.90% | 5.38% | 17.41% | -11.68% | 16.85% | -2.63% | 9.30% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 6.48% | 21.60% | 14.64% | 9.46% | -0.90% | 21.36% | 8.43% | 25.36% | -9.32% | 10.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBDV.L and SBUY.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GBDV.L and SBUY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Financial Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Utilities
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Real Estate
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Industrials
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Communication Services
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Defensive
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Energy
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Healthcare
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Consumer Cyclical
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Technology
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Basic Materials
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank
GBDV.L
SBUY.L
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBDV.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 5.25 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.91 | 16.93 | -7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBDV.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.57 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.80 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.85 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBDV.L drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than SBUY.L's maximum drawdown of -30.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBDV.L and SBUY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBDV.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -30.91% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.04% | -4.79% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.42% | -17.76% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.84% | -17.76% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.77% | -30.91% | -3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | 0.00% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -3.99% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.49% | +0.44% |
Volatility
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBDV.L | SBUY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.32% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 7.04% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 9.81% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 13.73% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.13% | 15.51% | -1.38% |
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBDV.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBDV.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison
GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than SBUY.L's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBDV.L SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS | 4.50% | 4.91% | 4.49% | 4.87% | 5.05% | 4.26% | 4.41% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 4.26% | 4.74% | 5.72% |
SBUY.L Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF | 1.69% | 1.86% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.20% | 1.62% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBDV.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SBUY.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBUY.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.
GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index, while SBUY.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GBDV.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.
Find the right allocation for GBDV.L and SBUY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer