PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU.TO) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAU.TO achieves a -14.33% return, which is significantly lower than MUX.TO's 13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GAU.TO has underperformed MUX.TO with an annualized return of -4.88%, while MUX.TO has yielded a comparatively higher -0.78% annualized return.


GAU.TO

1D
-2.92%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-14.33%
6M
-8.84%
1Y
45.85%
3Y*
57.87%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
-4.88%

MUX.TO

1D
-6.06%
1M
4.10%
YTD
13.70%
6M
10.70%
1Y
134.96%
3Y*
38.73%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
-0.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAU.TO
Galiano Gold Inc.
-14.33%94.97%45.53%70.83%-20.88%-36.36%16.26%41.38%-2.25%-78.40%
MUX.TO
McEwen Mining Inc.
13.70%127.91%17.31%19.72%-30.18%-8.80%-24.70%-33.60%-12.39%-27.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GAU.TO and MUX.TO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2006

0.43

The correlation between GAU.TO and MUX.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (5 years) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GAU.TO:

CA$806.50M

MUX.TO:

CA$2.10B

EPS

GAU.TO:

CA$0.11

MUX.TO:

CA$1.24

PE Ratio

GAU.TO:

26.52

MUX.TO:

23.34

PEG Ratio

GAU.TO:

0.21

MUX.TO:

0.68

PS Ratio

GAU.TO:

1.48

MUX.TO:

7.33

PB Ratio

GAU.TO:

3.17

MUX.TO:

3.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

GAU.TO:

CA$537.43M

MUX.TO:

CA$235.72M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GAU.TO:

CA$260.74M

MUX.TO:

CA$47.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

GAU.TO:

CA$245.70M

MUX.TO:

CA$35.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAU.TO
GAU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GAU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GAU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MUX.TO
MUX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MUX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MUX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU.TO) and McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAU.TOMUX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

2.06

-1.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

2.49

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

3.81

-2.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.35

8.72

-6.37

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the MUX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAU.TO and MUX.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAU.TOMUX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.06

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.18

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

-0.01

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

-0.07

+0.16

Drawdowns

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAU.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.83%, roughly equal to the maximum MUX.TO drawdown of -95.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAU.TO and MUX.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAU.TOMUX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.83%

-95.76%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.98%

-35.67%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.52%

-44.54%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.03%

-80.85%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.93%

-93.84%

+1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.81%

-67.95%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.94%

-68.17%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.59%

15.54%

+4.05%

Volatility

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Galiano Gold Inc. (GAU.TO) is 19.11%, while McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX.TO) has a volatility of 20.52%. This indicates that GAU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAU.TOMUX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.11%

20.52%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.28%

47.47%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.31%

65.91%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.56%

61.45%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.39%

62.36%

+0.03%

Dividends

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GAU.TO nor MUX.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAU.TO
Galiano Gold Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MUX.TO
McEwen Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%0.21%0.33%0.41%

Financials

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Galiano Gold Inc. and McEwen Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
163.79M
73.86M
(GAU.TO) Total Revenue
(MUX.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

GAU.TO vs. MUX.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Galiano Gold Inc. and McEwen Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
55.7%
34.0%
Portfolio components
GAU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Galiano Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.28M and revenue of 163.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.7%.

MUX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McEwen Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.08M and revenue of 73.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

GAU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Galiano Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 85.92M and revenue of 163.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.

MUX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McEwen Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 10.88M and revenue of 73.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

GAU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Galiano Gold Inc. reported a net income of 32.16M and revenue of 163.79M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.

MUX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McEwen Mining Inc. reported a net income of 33.29M and revenue of 73.86M, resulting in a net margin of 45.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAU.TO and MUX.TO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAU.TO and MUX.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer