PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GATC.L vs. ASRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in GATTACA plc (GATC.L) and Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GATC.L is traded in GBp, while ASRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASRT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GATC.L achieves a 67.55% return, which is significantly lower than ASRT's 161.03% return. Over the past 10 years, GATC.L has outperformed ASRT with an annualized return of -7.38%, while ASRT has yielded a comparatively lower -32.09% annualized return.


GATC.L

1D
2.05%
1M
30.13%
YTD
67.55%
6M
47.11%
1Y
90.06%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
-5.15%
10Y*
-7.38%

ASRT

1D
0.59%
1M
7.59%
YTD
161.03%
6M
103.47%
1Y
143.86%
3Y*
-38.02%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*
-32.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GATC.L
GATTACA plc
67.55%9.53%-40.13%120.87%-49.64%73.84%-37.89%20.19%-64.14%18.81%
ASRT
Assertio Holdings, Inc.
161.03%-35.53%-17.17%-76.36%120.70%53.85%-72.23%-66.69%-52.50%-59.19%

Correlation

The correlation between GATC.L and ASRT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2007

0.03

The correlation between GATC.L and ASRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GATC.L:

£48.36M

ASRT:

$150.81M

EPS

GATC.L:

£0.12

ASRT:

-$5.27

PS Ratio

GATC.L:

0.06

ASRT:

1.51

PB Ratio

GATC.L:

1.59

ASRT:

1.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

GATC.L:

£812.42M

ASRT:

$102.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GATC.L:

£80.57M

ASRT:

$71.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

GATC.L:

£9.91M

ASRT:

-$2.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GATC.L vs. ASRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GATC.L
GATC.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GATC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GATC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GATC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GATC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GATC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRT
ASRT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ASRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GATTACA plc (GATC.L) and Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GATC.LASRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

3.85

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

9.81

+2.59

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GATC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the ASRT Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GATC.L and ASRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GATC.LASRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.57

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

-0.02

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

-0.39

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.14

+0.13

Drawdowns

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GATC.L drawdown since its inception was -94.19%, smaller than the maximum ASRT drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GATC.L and ASRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GATC.LASRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.19%

-99.51%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-37.59%

+19.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.99%

-91.62%

+41.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.16%

-93.19%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.24%

-99.50%

+7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.03%

-98.63%

+32.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-60.77%

+9.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.43%

14.73%

-7.30%

Volatility

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Volatility Comparison

GATTACA plc (GATC.L) has a higher volatility of 21.49% compared to Assertio Holdings, Inc. (ASRT) at 4.04%. This indicates that GATC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GATC.LASRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.49%

4.04%

+17.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.41%

40.35%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.39%

56.47%

-11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.04%

78.85%

-28.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.90%

83.43%

-32.53%

Dividends

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Dividend Comparison

GATC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, while ASRT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASRT
Assertio Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GATC.L
GATTACA plc
2.23%3.33%2.94%3.42%0.00%1.09%0.00%0.00%2.82%7.56%8.33%4.29%

Financials

GATC.L vs. ASRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GATTACA plc and Assertio Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
212.43M
9.93M
(GATC.L) Total Revenue
(ASRT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GATC.L values in GBp, ASRT values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


GATC.L and ASRT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GATC.L and ASRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer