PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAP vs. DECK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GAP vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gap, Inc. (GAP) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAP achieves a -20.58% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, GAP has underperformed DECK with an annualized return of 1.47%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively higher 26.25% annualized return.


GAP

1D
-2.31%
1M
-5.13%
6M
-24.40%
YTD
-20.58%
1Y
1.49%
3Y*
33.77%
5Y*
-3.85%
10Y*
1.47%
ALL TIME*
7.24%

DECK

1D
-2.30%
1M
-4.65%
6M
3.33%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
10.03%
10Y*
26.25%
ALL TIME*
14.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAP vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
-20.58%11.74%16.14%96.66%-32.64%-11.11%15.73%-28.11%-21.95%56.05%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.36%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%44.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GAP and DECK is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 1993

0.28

Over the past year, GAP and DECK have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GAP:

$7.16B

DECK:

$14.45B

EPS

GAP:

$2.53

DECK:

$7.02

PE Ratio

GAP:

7.86

DECK:

14.81

PEG Ratio

GAP:

0.23

DECK:

0.54

PS Ratio

GAP:

0.49

DECK:

2.77

PB Ratio

GAP:

2.06

DECK:

5.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

GAP:

$15.40B

DECK:

$5.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GAP:

$6.24B

DECK:

$3.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

GAP:

$1.71B

DECK:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAP vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAP
GAP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAP vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gap, Inc. (GAP) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GAPDECKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

0.06

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

0.12

-0.02

GAP vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAP Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is comparable to the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAP and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GAP vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAP drawdown since its inception was -85.61%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAP and DECK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAPDECKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.61%

-94.36%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.97%

-35.81%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.00%

-64.35%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.39%

-64.35%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.13%

-64.35%

-18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.91%

-53.37%

+17.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.90%

-40.39%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.59%

17.42%

-2.83%

Volatility

GAP vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

The Gap, Inc. (GAP) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) at 11.02%. This indicates that GAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAPDECKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.67%

11.02%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.42%

31.81%

+3.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.75%

45.82%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.65%

44.10%

+11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.38%

42.55%

+12.83%

Dividends

GAP vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

GAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
3.42%2.52%2.54%2.87%5.05%2.73%1.20%5.49%3.72%2.03%5.12%3.68%

Financials

GAP vs. DECK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Gap, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
3.50B
1.12B
(GAP) Total Revenue
(DECK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GAP vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Gap, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%20222023202420252026
40.5%
57.6%
Portfolio components
GAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gap, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.5%.

DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

GAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gap, Inc. reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

GAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Gap, Inc. reported a net income of 339.00M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAP and DECK have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAP has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to DECK (11.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAP dropped -85.61% vs DECK's -94.36%.

DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAP and DECK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer