PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAOSX vs. WARAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund (GAOSX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAOSX achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than WARAX's 18.69% return. Over the past 10 years, GAOSX has outperformed WARAX with an annualized return of 7.40%, while WARAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.


GAOSX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.44%
YTD
6.21%
6M
6.81%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
4.58%
10Y*
7.40%

WARAX

1D
0.23%
1M
1.87%
YTD
18.69%
6M
19.75%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
14.26%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
5.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAOSX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund
6.21%14.96%8.21%13.02%-18.59%9.54%15.55%16.27%-5.81%17.12%
WARAX
Allspring Absolute Return Fund
18.69%8.07%5.93%12.53%-2.75%2.25%-3.25%11.65%-5.78%12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GAOSX and WARAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2013

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between GAOSX and WARAX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAOSX vs. WARAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAOSX
GAOSX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GAOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GAOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

WARAX
WARAX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
WARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
WARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
WARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund (GAOSX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAOSXWARAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

3.36

-1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

4.73

-2.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.63

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

7.42

-5.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.72

26.14

-18.43

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAOSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the WARAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAOSX and WARAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAOSXWARAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

3.36

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.92

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.74

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.62

+0.06

Drawdowns

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAOSX drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, which is greater than WARAX's maximum drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAOSX and WARAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAOSXWARAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-23.16%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-3.79%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

-5.67%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.98%

-14.64%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.98%

-23.16%

-1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.38%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-3.84%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.08%

+1.07%

Volatility

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund (GAOSX) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) at 2.43%. This indicates that GAOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAOSXWARAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.43%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

6.80%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.80%

8.38%

+1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

7.66%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

7.93%

+2.85%

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAOSX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than WARAX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

GAOSX vs. WARAX - Dividend Comparison

GAOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.77%, more than WARAX's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAOSX
JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund
9.77%10.23%2.52%0.00%4.86%10.17%1.67%2.65%2.71%3.18%2.76%1.16%
WARAX
Allspring Absolute Return Fund
1.69%2.00%10.90%2.80%2.34%3.23%3.34%3.38%2.66%1.77%0.76%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAOSX and WARAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GAOSX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to WARAX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GAOSX dropped -24.98% vs WARAX's -23.16%.

WARAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAOSX and WARAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer