GALP.LS vs. JEPQ
GALP.LS (Galp Energia SGPS S.A.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, GALP.LS returned 26.76%/yr vs 17.60%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GALP.LS is traded in EUR, while JEPQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JEPQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GALP.LS achieves a 32.90% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 10.67% return.
GALP.LS
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 32.90%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 26.76%
- 5Y*
- 19.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GALP.LS Galp Energia SGPS S.A. | 32.90% | -4.14% | 23.10% | 10.93% | 20.83% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.67% | 1.51% | 33.09% | 32.20% | -13.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GALP.LS and JEPQ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
GALP.LS
JEPQ
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galp Energia SGPS S.A. (GALP.LS) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GALP.LS | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 4.29 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 16.95 | -12.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GALP.LS | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.13 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.83 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GALP.LS drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -24.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GALP.LS and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GALP.LS | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.19% | -24.78% | -42.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.27% | -6.18% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.12% | -24.78% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.26% | -0.25% | -12.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.23% | -5.18% | -18.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.09% | 1.56% | +7.53% |
Volatility
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Galp Energia SGPS S.A. (GALP.LS) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.11%. This indicates that GALP.LS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GALP.LS | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 1.11% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.12% | 8.82% | +18.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.52% | 12.44% | +18.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.31% | 16.92% | +14.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 16.92% | +13.50% |
Dividends
GALP.LS vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
GALP.LS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than JEPQ's 10.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GALP.LS Galp Energia SGPS S.A. | 3.35% | 4.44% | 3.54% | 4.08% | 4.15% | 7.23% | 4.50% | 4.64% | 4.28% | 3.34% | 3.30% | 3.64% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.08% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GALP.LS and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GALP.LS and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer