PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF DR Hedged GBP (D) (GOVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAGG.L achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than GOVG.L's -0.17% return.


GAGG.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
0.64%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*

GOVG.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
-2.59%
1Y
-0.71%
3Y*
0.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GAGG.L
Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M
0.08%0.42%0.19%-0.73%-5.96%0.01%
GOVG.L
Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF DR Hedged GBP (D)
-0.17%0.76%-0.52%2.69%-14.37%-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GAGG.L and GOVG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.44

The correlation between GAGG.L and GOVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAGG.L
GOVG.L

Real Estate

18.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

16.6%
7.4%

Financial Services

13.6%
19.1%

Industrials

10.9%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
12.2%

Utilities

10.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
8.2%

Communication Services

8.4%
6.0%

Technology

2.0%
18.1%

Basic Materials

-

9.0%

Energy

-

5.2%

Real Estate

GAGG.L
18.0%
GOVG.L
1.9%

Healthcare

GAGG.L
16.6%
GOVG.L
7.4%

Financial Services

GAGG.L
13.6%
GOVG.L
19.1%

Industrials

GAGG.L
10.9%
GOVG.L
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GAGG.L
10.8%
GOVG.L
12.2%

Utilities

GAGG.L
10.4%
GOVG.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

GAGG.L
9.4%
GOVG.L
8.2%

Communication Services

GAGG.L
8.4%
GOVG.L
6.0%

Technology

GAGG.L
2.0%
GOVG.L
18.1%

Basic Materials

GAGG.L

-

GOVG.L
9.0%

Energy

GAGG.L

-

GOVG.L
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAGG.L
GAGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GAGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GOVG.L
GOVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
GOVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
GOVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) and Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF DR Hedged GBP (D) (GOVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAGG.LGOVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.98

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

-0.13

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

-0.28

+2.03

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the GOVG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAGG.L and GOVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAGG.LGOVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

-0.14

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

-0.55

+0.57

Drawdowns

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAGG.L drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, which is greater than GOVG.L's maximum drawdown of -17.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAGG.L and GOVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAGG.LGOVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.47%

-17.52%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-4.41%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.94%

-5.40%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.03%

-13.83%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-11.97%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.16%

-0.38%

Volatility

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) is 1.19%, while Amundi Index J.P. Morgan GBI Global Govies UCITS ETF DR Hedged GBP (D) (GOVG.L) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that GAGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAGG.LGOVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.50%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.47%

3.74%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

4.27%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

5.14%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.17%

5.14%

+2.03%

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAGG.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GOVG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GAGG.L vs. GOVG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GAGG.L nor GOVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GAGG.L and GOVG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GAGG.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GAGG.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GOVG.L.

GAGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while GOVG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for GAGG.L and 0.15% for GOVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAGG.L and GOVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer