PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GAGG.L is traded in GBp, while GLBL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLBL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAGG.L achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than GLBL.L's -1.47% return.


GAGG.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
0.64%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*

GLBL.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.52%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.75%
1Y
0.31%
3Y*
-2.10%
5Y*
-2.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GAGG.L
Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M
0.08%0.42%0.19%-0.73%-5.96%-3.91%5.63%2.75%8.44%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
-1.47%-2.39%-2.65%-2.45%-7.22%-5.08%3.70%1.65%7.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GAGG.L and GLBL.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.95

The correlation between GAGG.L and GLBL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GAGG.L
GLBL.L

Real Estate

18.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

16.6%
0.2%

Financial Services

13.6%
1.5%

Industrials

10.9%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
0.2%

Utilities

10.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
0.1%

Communication Services

8.4%
0.3%

Technology

2.0%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.1%

Real Estate

GAGG.L
18.0%
GLBL.L
0.0%

Healthcare

GAGG.L
16.6%
GLBL.L
0.2%

Financial Services

GAGG.L
13.6%
GLBL.L
1.5%

Industrials

GAGG.L
10.9%
GLBL.L
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

GAGG.L
10.8%
GLBL.L
0.2%

Utilities

GAGG.L
10.4%
GLBL.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

GAGG.L
9.4%
GLBL.L
0.1%

Communication Services

GAGG.L
8.4%
GLBL.L
0.3%

Technology

GAGG.L
2.0%
GLBL.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

GAGG.L

-

GLBL.L
0.0%

Energy

GAGG.L

-

GLBL.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAGG.L
GAGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GAGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GLBL.L
GLBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAGG.LGLBL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.01

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.02

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

0.04

+1.71

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAGG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAGG.L and GLBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAGG.LGLBL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.02

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

-0.43

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

-0.16

+0.18

Drawdowns

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAGG.L drawdown since its inception was -19.47%, smaller than the maximum GLBL.L drawdown of -25.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAGG.L and GLBL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAGG.LGLBL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.47%

-25.17%

+5.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

-5.16%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.94%

-8.09%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.17%

-18.62%

+4.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.03%

-24.05%

+10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-12.84%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.69%

-0.91%

Volatility

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) is 1.19%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that GAGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLBL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAGG.LGLBL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.36%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.47%

3.61%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

5.00%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

6.74%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.17%

7.27%

-0.10%

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GAGG.L has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLBL.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GAGG.L vs. GLBL.L - Dividend Comparison

GAGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLBL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GAGG.L
Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.02%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


GAGG.L and GLBL.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GAGG.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GAGG.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLBL.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for GAGG.L and 0.10% for GLBL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAGG.L and GLBL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer