GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L
GAAA.L (iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - GAAA.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAAA.L returned -3.02%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GAAA.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAAA.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.81% return.
GAAA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAA.L iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.12% | 10.43% | -5.07% | 8.26% | -20.61% | -8.76% | 12.37% | 4.92% | -1.16% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.81% | 21.14% | 19.09% | 23.79% | -18.13% | 22.52% | 15.68% | 27.97% | -9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAAA.L and SWDA.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, GAAA.L and SWDA.L have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GAAA.L
SWDA.L
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAAA.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.41 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.02 | -2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 13.29 | -12.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAAA.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 2.27 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.78 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.73 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAA.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAAA.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -33.62% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.08% | -8.59% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.29% | -17.07% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.55% | -26.50% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | -0.42% | -17.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -4.58% | -9.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Volatility
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) is 2.52%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that GAAA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAAA.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 2.81% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 8.58% | -2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.23% | 11.41% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.91% | 15.30% | -6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 15.73% | -7.77% |
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GAAA.L and SWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GAAA.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAAA.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAAA.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAAA.L and SWDA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
GAAA.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. GAAA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index.
Find the right allocation for GAAA.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer