GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L
GAAA.L (iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and GLAD.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Bonds funds - GAAA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD while GLAD.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GAAA.L returned -3.02%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GLAD.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GAAA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLAD.L.
Performance
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GAAA.L achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly lower than GLAD.L's 0.54% return.
GAAA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAD.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 0.65%
- 10Y*
- —
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAAA.L iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.12% | 10.43% | -5.07% | 8.26% | -20.61% | -8.76% | 12.37% | 0.17% |
GLAD.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 0.54% | 4.72% | 3.23% | 6.73% | -11.24% | -1.59% | 5.21% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GAAA.L and GLAD.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019 | 0.68 |
The correlation between GAAA.L and GLAD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L — Risk / Return Rank
GAAA.L
GLAD.L
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GAAA.L | GLAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 1.51 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | 4.60 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GAAA.L | GLAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.09 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.15 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.23 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, which is greater than GLAD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAAA.L and GLAD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GAAA.L | GLAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -15.20% | -17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.08% | -2.30% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.29% | -3.78% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.55% | -15.05% | -15.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | -1.01% | -16.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -4.55% | -9.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 0.76% | +1.19% |
Volatility
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global AAA-AA Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GAAA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.52% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L) at 1.38%. This indicates that GAAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GAAA.L | GLAD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 1.38% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 2.63% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.23% | 3.19% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.91% | 4.48% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 4.27% | +3.69% |
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GAAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GLAD.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GAAA.L vs. GLAD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GAAA.L nor GLAD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GAAA.L and GLAD.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLAD.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLAD.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GAAA.L.
GAAA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while GLAD.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GAAA.L and 0.10% for GLAD.L.
Find the right allocation for GAAA.L and GLAD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer