PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZROX vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZROX achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 3.46% return.


FZROX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.62%
YTD
10.41%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*

FSUVX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
3.46%
6M
2.97%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
10.41%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
3.46%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%21.51%9.86%27.73%-4.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FZROX and FSUVX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.87

The correlation between FZROX and FSUVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZROX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FZROXFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.61

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

6.69

+7.08

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZROX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZROX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZROX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZROX and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZROXFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-32.41%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-7.28%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-11.55%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-19.48%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-2.76%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.48%

-3.27%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.74%

+0.24%

Volatility

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) at 2.71%. This indicates that FZROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZROXFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

2.71%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

6.54%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.88%

8.59%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

12.97%

+4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

15.19%

+4.94%

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZROX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZROX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

FZROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FSUVX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.30%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZROX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSUVX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZROX dropped -34.96% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZROX and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer