PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZROX vs. FCFMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund (FCFMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FZROX having a 12.01% return and FCFMX slightly higher at 12.09%.


FZROX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.79%
YTD
12.01%
6M
11.92%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

FCFMX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.84%
YTD
12.09%
6M
11.99%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.56%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
12.01%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%10.82%
FCFMX
Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund
12.09%17.43%23.92%26.15%-19.53%25.64%20.81%10.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FZROX and FCFMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FZROX and FCFMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZROX vs. FCFMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FCFMX
FCFMX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FCFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund (FCFMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZROXFCFMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.39

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.66

15.56

+0.10

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZROX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FCFMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZROX and FCFMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZROXFCFMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.46

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.76

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.76

-0.04

Drawdowns

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZROX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FCFMX drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZROX and FCFMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZROXFCFMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-34.99%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-8.89%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-19.41%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-25.34%

+0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-5.57%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.93%

-0.01%

Volatility

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) and Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund (FCFMX) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZROXFCFMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.97%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

9.23%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

12.27%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

17.42%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

20.41%

-0.28%

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZROX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFMX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FZROX vs. FCFMX - Dividend Comparison

FZROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than FCFMX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCFMX
Fidelity Series Total Market Index Fund
1.00%1.41%1.27%1.45%1.78%1.56%1.88%1.35%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.91%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FZROX and FCFMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZROX has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to FCFMX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZROX dropped -34.96% vs FCFMX's -34.99%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZROX and FCFMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer