FZITX vs. DMREX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class M (FZITX) and DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX).
FZITX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 31, 2005. DMREX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 3, 2014.
Performance
FZITX vs. DMREX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FZITX vs. DMREX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZITX Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class M | -0.97% | 5.62% | 0.91% | 5.22% | -7.09% | 0.73% | 4.24% | 6.25% | 0.92% | 4.17% |
DMREX DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 1.10% | 2.77% | 3.10% | 2.56% | -1.42% | 6.75% | 4.11% | 6.64% | -0.51% | 2.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FZITX achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than DMREX's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FZITX has underperformed DMREX with an annualized return of 1.78%, while DMREX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.77% annualized return.
FZITX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.87%
- 10Y*
- 1.78%
DMREX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.58%
- 3Y*
- 2.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FZITX vs. DMREX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FZITX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DMREX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FZITX vs. DMREX — Risk / Return Rank
FZITX
DMREX
FZITX vs. DMREX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class M (FZITX) and DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FZITX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 2.31 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 3.35 | -1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.62 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.90 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 9.38 | -4.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FZITX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.31 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 1.10 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.88 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.86 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FZITX and DMREX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FZITX vs. DMREX - Dividend Comparison
FZITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than DMREX's 3.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZITX Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class M | 2.58% | 3.33% | 2.20% | 2.14% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.89% | 2.30% | 2.36% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.09% |
DMREX DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 3.30% | 2.95% | 3.55% | 1.96% | 1.16% | 0.98% | 1.44% | 2.26% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.15% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
FZITX vs. DMREX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FZITX drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum DMREX drawdown of -13.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZITX and DMREX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FZITX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -13.22% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.56% | -0.92% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.15% | -5.33% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.15% | -13.22% | +2.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.32% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -0.89% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 0.29% | +0.63% |
Volatility
FZITX vs. DMREX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Intermediate Municipal Income Fund Class M (FZITX) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX) at 0.49%. This indicates that FZITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMREX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FZITX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 0.49% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | 0.71% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 1.17% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.01% | 2.47% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.20% | 3.14% | +0.06% |