PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FZFLX vs. TLVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) and Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZFLX achieves a 31.03% return, which is significantly higher than TLVAX's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FZFLX has outperformed TLVAX with an annualized return of 13.89%, while TLVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.03% annualized return.


FZFLX

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.45%
YTD
31.03%
6M
32.60%
1Y
48.15%
3Y*
23.77%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.89%

TLVAX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
7.56%
6M
7.07%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
31.03%10.76%15.52%17.75%-15.62%20.40%19.78%31.96%-9.25%18.41%
TLVAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund
7.56%4.80%23.59%13.21%-11.70%26.86%13.07%26.39%-8.93%17.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FZFLX and TLVAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FZFLX and TLVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FZFLX vs. TLVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FZFLX
FZFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FZFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FZFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

TLVAX
TLVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TLVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TLVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) and Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FZFLXTLVAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

0.99

+1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

1.50

+1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.18

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

1.50

+2.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.03

4.47

+14.56

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the TLVAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZFLX and TLVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FZFLXTLVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

0.99

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.61

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.46

+0.17

Drawdowns

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZFLX drawdown since its inception was -42.03%, smaller than the maximum TLVAX drawdown of -55.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZFLX and TLVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FZFLXTLVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.03%

-55.23%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-7.46%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.29%

-14.96%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.77%

-20.69%

-4.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.03%

-37.34%

-4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-2.26%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-8.23%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.51%

+0.01%

Volatility

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund (TLVAX) at 2.91%. This indicates that FZFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FZFLXTLVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

2.91%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

8.63%

+9.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

11.48%

+9.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

16.08%

+5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.10%

17.34%

+3.76%

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZFLX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TLVAX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FZFLX vs. TLVAX - Dividend Comparison

FZFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.09%, more than TLVAX's 8.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
44.09%57.77%10.20%2.35%79.79%50.77%7.19%6.49%7.69%1.68%0.93%0.67%
TLVAX
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value Fund
8.52%9.16%20.11%0.86%5.52%4.35%3.39%11.83%10.96%6.78%1.25%12.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FZFLX and TLVAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZFLX has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to TLVAX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZFLX dropped -42.03% vs TLVAX's -55.23%.

FZFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FZFLX and TLVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer