FZFLX vs. RYDVX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FZFLX (Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund) and RYDVX (Royce Dividend Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FZFLX returned 13.18%/yr vs 11.56%/yr for RYDVX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FZFLX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for RYDVX.

Performance

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) and Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FZFLX achieves a 26.34% return, which is significantly higher than RYDVX's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FZFLX has outperformed RYDVX with an annualized return of 13.18%, while RYDVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.

FZFLX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -3.25%
• 6M: 16.70%
• YTD: 26.34%
• 1Y: 36.30%
• 3Y*: 18.81%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 13.18%
• ALL TIME*: 12.41%

RYDVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.54%
• 6M: 10.23%
• YTD: 19.75%
• 1Y: 32.11%
• 3Y*: 18.61%
• 5Y*: 11.07%
• 10Y*: 11.56%
• ALL TIME*: 9.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RYDVX Royce Dividend Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund	26.34%	10.76%	15.52%	17.75%	-15.62%	20.40%	19.78%	31.96%	-9.25%	18.41%
RYDVX Royce Dividend Value Fund	19.75%	9.44%	19.41%	23.29%	-13.63%	20.00%	4.45%	30.00%	-16.33%	21.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FZFLX and RYDVX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2015	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FZFLX and RYDVX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FZFLX vs. RYDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FZFLX

FZFLX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FZFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FZFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FZFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FZFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FZFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

RYDVX

RYDVX Risk / Return Rank: 65
RYDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RYDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RYDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RYDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RYDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) and Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FZFLX	RYDVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.62	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.65	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.96	2.43	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	7.02	+3.69

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FZFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the RYDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FZFLX and RYDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FZFLX drawdown since its inception was -42.03%, smaller than the maximum RYDVX drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FZFLX and RYDVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FZFLX	RYDVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.03%	-53.36%	+11.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-12.32%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.29%	-21.45%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.77%	-27.35%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.03%	-41.49%	-0.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.27%	-0.75%	-7.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-7.49%	+1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	4.26%	-1.03%

Volatility

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX) at 4.57%. This indicates that FZFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FZFLX	RYDVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.66%	4.57%	+3.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.12%	11.71%	+8.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.07%	18.48%	+4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.51%	19.06%	+2.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.27%	19.62%	+1.65%

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FZFLX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RYDVX's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

FZFLX vs. RYDVX - Dividend Comparison

FZFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.72%, less than RYDVX's 154.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZFLX Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund	45.72%	57.77%	10.20%	2.35%	79.79%	50.77%	7.19%	6.49%	7.69%	1.68%	0.93%	0.67%
RYDVX Royce Dividend Value Fund	154.32%	185.21%	21.24%	11.80%	0.57%	14.07%	5.55%	15.61%	14.15%	14.26%	10.48%	11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FZFLX and RYDVX in my portfolio?

FZFLX and RYDVX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FZFLX or RYDVX?

FZFLX has higher volatility (7.66%) compared to RYDVX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FZFLX dropped -42.03% vs RYDVX's -53.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.