PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYLSX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FYLSX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLSX achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than FRHMX's 4.14% return.


FYLSX

1D
0.66%
1M
5.39%
YTD
13.89%
6M
15.48%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*

FRHMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.37%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FYLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
13.89%22.85%18.32%21.03%-18.70%16.96%18.37%9.85%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
4.14%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.79%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLSX and FRHMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.74

The correlation between FYLSX and FRHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYLSX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLSX
FYLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FYLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FYLSX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYLSXFRHMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.52

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.13

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

13.40

+1.32

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLSX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYLSXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.59

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.82

-0.04

Drawdowns

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLSX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYLSXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-15.96%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.47%

-3.42%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

-4.90%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-15.96%

-11.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-3.50%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.80%

+1.34%

Volatility

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund (FYLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FYLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYLSXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

1.67%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

3.43%

+6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

4.16%

+8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

5.29%

+9.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

5.15%

+10.90%

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FYLSX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

FYLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than FRHMX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
3.25%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%0.00%0.00%
FYLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2050 Fund
6.56%3.62%7.86%2.22%5.82%6.93%5.73%7.01%8.17%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYLSX and FRHMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYLSX has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to FRHMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLSX dropped -31.26% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

FRHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYLSX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer