FYLD vs. VUSV
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.
Performance
FYLD vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly higher than VUSV's 7.21% return.
FYLD
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 35.30%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
VUSV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 16.00% | 3.93% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 7.21% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and VUSV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
VUSV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FYLD vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and VUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -7.06% | -37.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -1.96% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -1.28% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | — | — |
Volatility
FYLD vs. VUSV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.04% | 12.06% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 12.06% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 12.06% | +5.77% |
FYLD vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.47% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and VUSV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.30% for VUSV.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and VUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer