FYLD vs. VUSV
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.
Performance
FYLD vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than VUSV's 8.03% return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 18.73%
- 6M
- 21.10%
- 1Y
- 39.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
VUSV
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 8.03%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYLD vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 18.73% | 4.33% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 8.03% | 5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and VUSV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
VUSV
FYLD vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.45 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.72 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.66 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 2.36 | -1.90 |
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and VUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -7.06% | -37.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.83% | -1.32% | -7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.51% | — | — |
Volatility
FYLD vs. VUSV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | VUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 11.96% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 11.96% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 11.96% | +6.08% |
FYLD vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FYLD vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than VUSV's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.64% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and VUSV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.30% for VUSV.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and VUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer