FYLD vs. KLMT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FYLD is actively managed, while KLMT is passively managed. Over the past year, FYLD returned 39.47% vs 29.20% for KLMT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for KLMT.

Performance

FYLD vs. KLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 18.73% return, which is significantly higher than KLMT's 12.92% return.

FYLD

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 18.73%
• 6M: 21.10%
• 1Y: 39.47%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 11.56%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

KLMT

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 5.37%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 29.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYLD vs. KLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	18.73%	34.53%	-2.36%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	12.92%	21.31%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FYLD and KLMT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.61

The correlation between FYLD and KLMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

FYLD vs. KLMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FYLD	KLMT
Energy	32.7%	4.1%
Financial Services	18.9%	16.9%
Industrials	16.1%	10.2%
Basic Materials	9.4%	2.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	4.6%
Technology	4.2%	30.0%
Communication Services	4.1%	9.6%
Utilities	1.8%	2.0%
Healthcare	-	8.0%
Real Estate	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

FYLD vs. KLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 93
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 68
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYLD vs. KLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FYLD	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.45	2.33	+1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	3.24	+1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.42	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.66	3.13	+4.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.50	13.63	+13.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FYLD vs. KLMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYLD Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is higher than the KLMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYLD and KLMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FYLD	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45	2.33	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.31	-0.86

Drawdowns

FYLD vs. KLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than KLMT's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and KLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYLD	KLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.55%	-16.87%	-27.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.44%	-9.54%	+4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	0.00%	-1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-1.91%	-6.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	2.19%	-0.68%

Volatility

FYLD vs. KLMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 3.08%, while Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYLD	KLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	3.73%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.77%	10.04%	-1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.58%	12.58%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	15.85%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	15.85%	+2.19%

FYLD vs. KLMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMT's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FYLD vs. KLMT - Dividend Comparison

FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than KLMT's 1.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.64%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	1.73%	1.95%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FYLD and KLMT in my portfolio?

FYLD and KLMT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FYLD or KLMT?

KLMT has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to FYLD (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs KLMT's -16.87%.

Which ETF is better, FYLD or KLMT?

On 1-year performance, FYLD leads with 39.47% vs 29.20% for KLMT. On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FYLD or KLMT?

Over the 1-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 39.47% return vs 29.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FYLD or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FYLD or KLMT?

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.73% for KLMT.

What is the main difference between FYLD and KLMT?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FYLD and 0.10% for KLMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.