FYLD vs. EWY
FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. FYLD is actively managed, while EWY is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FYLD returned 12.08%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for EWY. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
FYLD vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FYLD achieves a 19.96% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 103.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FYLD has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 12.08%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.84% annualized return.
FYLD
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 20.90%
- 1Y
- 38.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
FYLD vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.96% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FYLD and EWY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FYLD and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FYLD vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FYLD
EWY
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
FYLD
EWY
Financial Services
FYLD
EWY
Industrials
FYLD
EWY
Basic Materials
FYLD
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
FYLD
EWY
Consumer Defensive
FYLD
EWY
Technology
FYLD
EWY
Communication Services
FYLD
EWY
Utilities
FYLD
EWY
Healthcare
FYLD
-
EWY
Real Estate
FYLD
-
EWY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FYLD vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
FYLD
EWY
FYLD vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FYLD | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.59 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.11 | 8.65 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.06 | 30.24 | -5.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FYLD vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FYLD drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYLD and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FYLD | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -74.14% | +29.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.44% | -23.08% | +17.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.15% | -27.36% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.12% | -48.55% | +23.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.55% | -49.73% | +5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -8.88% | +8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -20.11% | +11.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 6.59% | -5.05% |
Volatility
FYLD vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) is 3.71%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.64%. This indicates that FYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FYLD | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 25.64% | -21.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 42.65% | -33.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 46.51% | -34.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 30.15% | -13.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 28.06% | -10.05% |
FYLD vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FYLD and EWY have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
FYLD vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
FYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than EWY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.60% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FYLD and EWY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to FYLD (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYLD dropped -44.55% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 12.08% for FYLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYLD and EWY have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
FYLD is categorized as Global Equities, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and iShares.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 3.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FYLD and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer