PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FYBTX vs. FJTDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund (FJTDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYBTX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than FJTDX's 1.59% return.


FYBTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.34%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
2.57%

FJTDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.95%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
0.91%5.72%5.13%6.08%-3.50%-0.54%3.99%5.07%0.78%
FJTDX
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund
1.59%4.75%5.69%5.48%1.00%0.16%1.57%3.20%0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FYBTX and FJTDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FYBTX vs. FJTDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYBTX
FYBTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FYBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FYBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FJTDX
FJTDX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FJTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund (FJTDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FYBTXFJTDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

3.45

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.15

16.28

-12.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

6.97

-5.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

49.00

-45.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.37

125.24

-110.88

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYBTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is lower than the FJTDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYBTX and FJTDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FYBTXFJTDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

3.45

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

2.58

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

2.42

-1.04

Drawdowns

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYBTX drawdown since its inception was -6.00%, which is greater than FJTDX's maximum drawdown of -1.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYBTX and FJTDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FYBTXFJTDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.00%

-1.90%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-0.10%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-0.90%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.00%

-0.90%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-0.08%

-0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.04%

+0.28%

Volatility

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund (FYBTX) has a higher volatility of 0.54% compared to Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund (FJTDX) at 0.35%. This indicates that FYBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJTDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FYBTXFJTDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

0.35%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.40%

0.92%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92%

1.28%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

1.44%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.92%

1.28%

+0.64%

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYBTX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FJTDX's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FYBTX vs. FJTDX - Dividend Comparison

FYBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than FJTDX's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FJTDX
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Bond Fund
4.37%4.63%5.42%4.70%1.39%0.36%1.45%2.65%1.17%0.00%0.00%
FYBTX
Fidelity Series Short-Term Credit Fund
4.73%4.66%3.67%2.76%1.26%1.65%2.31%2.72%2.45%1.59%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FYBTX and FJTDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYBTX has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to FJTDX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FYBTX dropped -6.00% vs FJTDX's -1.90%.

FJTDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FYBTX and FJTDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer